Mention Gap in AI Tracker shows where competitors are mentioned in AI answers and your brand isn’t. Identify coverage gaps, get a ready-made outreach list, and even buy placements directly when available.
A mention isn’t always a win.
If AI calls you “expensive,” “hard to use,” or frames you wrong, you’re visible alright… just in the worst way.
That’s why we’ve added Sentiment Analysis to AI Tracker. It lets you see how AI-cited sources actually frame your brand across all tracked prompts, so you can spot harmful or misleading narratives early.
How it works
Sentiment Analysis evaluates the sources used in AI answers and shows how your brand is being described in context.
This means you can now:
- Review positive, neutral, and negative sentiment tied to specific prompts.
- See exact phrasing and framing used by AI-cited sources.
- Understand whether visibility helps reinforce your positioning — or quietly undermines it.
Instead of treating every mention as a success, you get a clearer picture of what those mentions actually say.
Why it matters
AI answers are trusted by default.
Misleading or negative framing can spread without triggering obvious red flags — no ranking drops, no alerts, no complaints. Just lost confidence and missed deals.
Sentiment Analysis helps you catch those issues early, before they compound across multiple AI-generated answers.
What to do when you spot a bad/neutral/misleading mention
When you find a neutral, misleading, or negative mention, the next step is simple: fix the source.
You can:
- Reach out to the site owner directly, or
- Use a paid inclusion provider when available.
AI models constantly refresh, scrape, and remix content.
Correcting the source improves how your brand appears in future answers.
We care about your feedback
Give Sentiment analysis a try and let us know how you like it and what could be improved.